High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak v. Dr.S.P.Gupta - ITR-161-1989  RD-P&H 8571 (13 October 2006)
I.T.R No.161 of 1989
Date of decision:24.10.2006
Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak ...Petitioner Versus
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr.Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the revenue.
Following question of law has been referred for opinion of this Court by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench "D" Delhi arising out of its order dated 18.2.1983 passed in I.T.A.No.4982(Del) of 1981, in respect of the assessment year 1978- 79.
"i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the income from Paying Clinic should be taxed under the head 'profits or gains of profession', and not under the head 'salary'?"
ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that there was no relationship of employee and employer, when the assessee worked in the paying clinic run by the Government?
The questions have already been gone into by this Court in the judgment rendered in Commissioner of Income Tax, Rohtak Vs. Dr.Usha Verma, Rohtak, ITR No.47 of 1985, decided on 21.11.2001 and the questions have been answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
In view of the above, the questions referred are answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.
(Adarsh Kumar Goel)
October 24 ,2006 (Rajesh Bindal)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.