High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Manju Bala v. State of Punjab & Anr - CWP-8471-2005  RD-P&H 8612 (16 October 2006)
Manju Bala Versus State of Punjab and others Present: Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr.BS Chahal, AAG Punjab for respondents 1 and 2.
Mr.GS Bal, Advocate for respondents 3 and 6.
None for the remaining respondents despite service. In view of the above, respondents 4 and 5 are proceeded against exparte.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are certain technical defects in the instant writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the same so as to enable him to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action by removing technical defects.
Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.
( J. S. KHEHAR )
( S. D. ANAND )
October 24, 2006 JUDGE
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.