MANJU BALA versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Manju Bala v. State of Punjab & Anr - CWP-8471-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 8612 (16 October 2006)

CWP No.8471 of 2005

Manju Bala Versus State of Punjab and others Present: Mr.Arvind Kashyap, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr.BS Chahal, AAG Punjab for respondents 1 and 2.

Mr.GS Bal, Advocate for respondents 3 and 6.

***

J.S.KHEHAR,J. (Oral)

None for the remaining respondents despite service. In view of the above, respondents 4 and 5 are proceeded against exparte.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that there are certain technical defects in the instant writ petition and he may be permitted to withdraw the same so as to enable him to file a fresh writ petition on the same cause of action by removing technical defects.

Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the above, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned.

( J. S. KHEHAR )

JUDGE

( S. D. ANAND )

October 24, 2006 JUDGE

SRM

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.