High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Malkhan Singh v. Randhir Singh & Ors - RSA-2603-2004  RD-P&H 871 (16 February 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
R.S.A. No. 2603 of 2004 (O&M)
Date of Decision: February 27, 2006
Randhir Singh and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL.
Present:- Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate
for the appellant.
VINEY MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The defendant has concurrently lost before the two Courts below in a suit for possession filed by the plaintiffs The plaintiffs claimed that they are owners of the suit land and that the defendant was a trespasser.
The defendant contested the suit and claimed that he had become the owner of the suit land by way of adverse possession.
Both the Courts below have concurrently held that the defendant has failed to prove that he had matured his hostile possession in ownership by way of adverse possession. Consequently, the plea raised by the defendant was rejected.
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was decreed and the appeal filed by the defendant failed before the learned first Appellate Court.
R.S.A. No. 2603 of 2004 (O&M) 
Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to record.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal.
February 27, 2006 (VINEY MITTAL)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.