Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

N.A. versus N.A.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


n.a. v. n.a. - CRM-65344-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8711 (16 October 2006)

Crl. Misc. No.65344-M of 2006

Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate

for the petitioner.

---

The petitioner is in custody for the last more than one year and the statement of prosecutrix has already been recorded.

Bail was earlier declined and fresh application has been made on the ground that the prosecutrix's statement is not reliable.

Without expressing any opinion on merits, this contention cannot be accepted at this stage.

Let the trial Court conclude the trial as far as possible within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Petition stands disposed of.

October 27, 2006 (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)

ashwani JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.