High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
n.a. v. n.a. - CRM-65344-M-2006  RD-P&H 8711 (16 October 2006)
Present: Mr. Vikas Bahl, Advocate
for the petitioner.
The petitioner is in custody for the last more than one year and the statement of prosecutrix has already been recorded.
Bail was earlier declined and fresh application has been made on the ground that the prosecutrix's statement is not reliable.
Without expressing any opinion on merits, this contention cannot be accepted at this stage.
Let the trial Court conclude the trial as far as possible within three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
Petition stands disposed of.
October 27, 2006 (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.