Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUKESH versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mukesh v. State of Haryana - CRM-58085-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8821 (17 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.58085-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 19, 2006

Mukesh

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Y.D.Kaushik, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr.M.S.Sindhu, DAG, Haryana.

...

Petitioner Mukesh has filed this petition under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in case FIR No.218 dated 16.6.2005 registered under Sections 363/366/376 IPC at Police Station Old, Faridabad.

After hearing the counsel for the parties and going through the order dated 5.7.2006 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad and taking into consideration the statement of prosecutrix Nisha before the Court under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which direct allegations of rape have been levelled against the petitioner , I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

Dismissed.

October 19, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.