Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SULTAN SINGH & ANR versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sultan Singh & Anr v. State of Haryana - CRM-58323-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8823 (17 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.58323-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 24, 2006

Sultan Singh and another

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana.

...

The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.210 dated 21.7.2006 registered under Sections 323,324,326 and 34 IPC at Police Station Pundri, District Kaithal, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.

I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that in this case the petitioners have not caused any injury to any person, though they have been named in the FIR. Counsel further contends that in terms of the interim order dated September 22, 2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact and further states that the petitioners are no more required for further investigation.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the interim order dated September 22, 2006, the same is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter, the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

October 24, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.