Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHAM LAL versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Sham Lal v. State of Haryana & Anr. - CRM-28849-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8900 (19 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.28849-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:27.10.2006

Sham Lal ..........Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & Anr. ..........Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- None for the petitioner.

Shri SS Mor, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

for quashing of complaint No. 255 dated 18.10.2005 under Sections 376/395 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC titled as Kamla Devi Versus Sham Lal and all the consequential proceedings.

Counsel for the respondent-State has placed on record copy of the judgement dated 18.9.2006 passed by Additional Sessions Judge (Adhoc) Fast Track Court, Kurukshetra, whereby, the petitioner has been acquitted in the aforesaid complaint.

In view of the aforesaid fact, this petition has become infructuous and is dismissed as such.

October 27, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.