Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MOHINDER SINGH DHINGRA versus SH. ARPIT SHUKLA, IPS, SSP, FEROZEPUR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Mohinder Singh Dhingra v. Sh. Arpit Shukla, IPS, SSP, Ferozepur - COCP-828-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 8927 (19 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYRNA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.O.C.P. No.828 of 2006

Date of Decision:- 26.10.2006

Mohinder Singh Dhingra ....Petitioner

through

Mr.R.K.Girdhar, Advocate

vs.

Sh. Arpit Shukla, IPS, SSP, Ferozepur ....Respondent through

Mr.G.S.Cheema, Sr.DAG, Punjab

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
***

SURYA KANT, J.

The petitioner filed Crl.Misc.No.14874-M of 2006 which was disposed of by this Court on March 10, 2006 with a direction to the Sr.

Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur "to look into the matter and take appropriate action in accordance with law." Alleging non-compliance of the aforesaid order, this contempt petition has been filed.

On July13, 2006, Shri Cheema, learned State counsel was asked to seek instructions in the matter.

Pursuant thereto, Shri Cheema, learned Sr.DAG, Punjab has filed an affidavit of Shri Arpit Shukla, IPS, Sr. Superintendent of Police, Ferozepur. It is averred in the affidavit that pursuant to the directions issued by this Court an inquiry was got conducted by Shri Navtej Singh Chahal, PPS, Deputy Superintendent of Police, (SD), Ferozepur in which it has been found that the petitioner is habitual of making such kind of false complaints etc. due to his disturbed mental condition and due to his domestic problems. It is further averred that during the course of enquiry, an attempt was made to associate the petitioner but he refused to join the same.

Though it is not desirable or expedient to express any view in relation to the merits of the allegations made by the petitioner, however, in view of the fact that the directions issued by this Court have been complied with by the respondent, this petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to seek redressal of his grievances by approaching an appropriate forum, if so advised.

Rule discharged.

October 26, 2006 ( SURYA KANT )

poonam JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.