Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

AMANDEEP SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Amandeep Singh v. State of Punjab - CRM-54599-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9022 (23 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.54599-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 26, 2006

Amandeep Singh

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Punjab

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Rajesh Bhatheja, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab.

...

Petitioner Amandeep Singh apprehending his arrest in a non- bailable offence in case FIR No.213 dated 19.6.2006 registered under Sections 336/188 IPC, Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act and Section 61(1) of the Excise Act, at Police Station City-I Moga, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.

I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that the only allegation against the petitioner is that he had organized an exhibition of vulgar dances and firing at publc place without any reasonable cause at the time of celebrating the election of the Chemists Association, Moga. Counsel further contends that totally false allegations have been levelled due to political rivalry. Counsel contends that in terms of the interim order dated September 12, 2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact and further on instructions from ASI Tara Chand states that the petitioner is no more required for further investigation.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the interim order dated September 12, 2006, the same is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter, the petitioner shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

October 26, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.