SANJEEV JAIN versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Sanjeev Jain v. State of Haryana & Ors - CRM-65912-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9054 (23 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.65912-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: OCTOBER 26, 2006

Sanjeev Jain

...PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana and another

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. G.S.Sandhu, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

...

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

for quashing FIR No.60 dated 6.2.2006 under Sections 279/338/304-A IPC at P.S.Sector 5, Panchkula and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom.

After arguing for some time, counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all the points raised in this petition at the appropriate stage of the trial, including at the stage of framing of the charge.

Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

It will be open for the petitioner to move before the trial Court for personal exemption before the trial Court. If any such application is filed, the same will be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law.

October 26, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.