Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ASHOK KUMAR versus PANJAB UNIVERSITY & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ashok Kumar v. Panjab University & Anr - CWP-15064-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9107 (24 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.15064 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: October 9, 2006

Ashok Kumar

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Panjab University and another

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri R.K.Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Nitin Goyal and Ms.Arti Vashisht, Advocates for respondent No.1.

Shri R.S.Manhas, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

The petitioner had appeared in BA Part I examination conducted in April 2006. He is aggrieved against the inaction of the respondent University, whereby his result has not been declared so far.

Shri Nitin Goyal, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent University has contended that the petitioner was placed in compartment in his +2 examination and till July 2006, the University had not received any information with regard to clearing of the aforesaid examination. It was because of the aforesaid fact that the result of the petitioner could not be declared by the University.

Shri R.K.Joshi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has, however, referred to the Certificate (Annexure P.2) dated November 10,2005, whereby the petitioner has been indicated to have cleared the compartment examination of his +2 class.

Shri R.K.Joshi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has also handed over a photocopy of the Result-cum- Detailed Marks Card to the learned counsel for the respondents.

In this view of the matter, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondent University to take a final decision on the claim made by the petitioner and if the petitioner is found to be eligible, declared result of his BA Part I examination within a period of three weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

October 9, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.