Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M/S SARNA MAL MATHURA DASS & ANR versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M/s Sarna Mal Mathura Dass & Anr v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-15923-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9112 (24 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.15923 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: October 9, 2006

M/s Sarna Mal Mathura Dass and another

....Petitioners

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Lakhwinder Singh Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioners claim that they are commission agents and as per the rules/regulations framed by the Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board, respondent No.2, are entitled to allotment of sites in New Anaj Mandi at Mansa. It has also been claimed by the petitioners that after the issuance of letters of intent, they have deposited 25% of the amount required for allotment of said sites, but the sites are not being allotted to them.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the averments made in the present petition, we dispose of the present petition by granting a liberty to the petitioner to approach the Secretary, Punjab State Agriculture Marketing Board, respondent No.2 for the grant of requisite relief.

For the aforesaid purpose, the petitioners shall file individual and detailed representations before the Secretary, Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board, respondent No.2 within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by appending all the relevant documents. In case any such representations are filed by the petitioners before the Secretary, Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board, respondent No.2, then the claim of the petitioners shall be considered and thereafter an appropriate decision shall be taken by the Secretary, Punjab State Agricultural Marketing Board, respondent No.2, by passing detailed and speaking orders within a further period of four months after the filing of the said representation.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

October 9, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.