Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BRIJ BHUPINDER SINGH versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Brij Bhupinder Singh v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-15940-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9113 (24 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.15940 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: October 9,2006

Brij Bhupinder Singh

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri P.S.Thiara, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents.

On the asking of Court, Shri Sukhdip Singh Brar, Additional Advocate General, Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the PUDA to restore the allotment of plot measuring 500 square yards in Urban Estate, SAS Nagar, Mohali. Further direction have been sought to hand over physical vacant possession of the said plot to the petitioner at the earliest and to charge the price of the plot in question from the petitioner in equated yearly instalments at the rates prevailing at the time of original allotment i.e. as per the original letter of allotment.

From the perusal of the record, we find that the petitioner has already filed a representation dated April 10,2006 (Annexure P.15) and even a reminder dated July 6, 2006 (Annexure P.16) which remain unresponded so far.

In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the Estate Officer, PUDA, SAS Nagar, Mohali, respondent No.3 to take a final decision on the aforesaid representation (Annexure P.15) within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

October 9, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.