Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SHEFALI AGGARWAL versus PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Shefali Aggarwal v. Punjab Technical University & Ors - CWP-16661-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9163 (24 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.16661 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: October 19, 2006

Shefali Aggarwal

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Punjab Technical University and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Yogesh Goel,Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 and 2 only.

On the asking of Court, Shri Ashish Rawal, Advocate accepts notice on behalf of Shri Anupam Gupta, Advocate for the said respondents.

Copies of the writ petition have been supplied to the learned counsel for the respondents.

The petitioner has approached this Court for issuance of directions to the respondents to issue a no objection certificate for migration to the Institute of Engineering and Technology Bhaddal, District Ropar to the petitioner, affiliated with the respondent Punjab Technical University.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the averments made by her in the present petition, we find that for redressal of her grievances, the petitioner has already issued a legal notice (Annexure P.9) dated September 21,

2006. We further find that University has already initiated proceedings on the aforesaid legal notice through a communication dated September 26, 2006 (Annexure P.10) when some information has been sought from GGS College of Modern Technology, Ludhiana Road, Kharar, respondent No.3.

In this view of the matter, without going into the merits of the claim made by the petitioner, we dispose of the present petition with a direction to the respondent Punjab Technical University to take a final decision on the claim made by the petitioner within a period of one month from the date a certified copy of this order is received, by passing a detailed and speaking order and take such further appropriate action, as may be required, in accordance with law.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

October 19, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.