High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Sumitter Singh v. Jagir Singh - RSA-4583-2004  RD-P&H 919 (17 February 2006)
R.S.A. No. 4583 of 2004
Date of Decision: February 2, 2006
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL.
Present:- Mr. Malkeet Singh, Advocate
for the appellant.
VINEY MITTAL, J. (ORAL)
The defendant lost concurrently in a suit for recovery for Rs.3,30,400/- filed by the plaintiff on account of pronote. The plaintiff claimed that on January 25, 1996, the defendant had executed a pronote an account of the loan of Rs.2 lacs at the interest of 2% per month. Since he had failed to make the payment, therefore, the suit was filed for the that the execution of any such pronote was denied by the defendant. He claimed that a fraud had been played.
Both the Courts below have held that the defendant had executed a pronote whereby he had taken a loan of Rs.2 lacs from the plaintiff. Since the amount in question was not repaid, therefore, the suit of the plaintiff was decreed and appeal of the defendant was failed before the learned first Appellate Court.
R.S.A. No. 4583 of 2004 
Nothing has been shown that the findings recorded by both the Courts below suffer from any infirmity or are contrary to record.
No question of law, much less any substantial question of law, arises in the present appeal.
February 2, 2006 (VINEY MITTAL)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.