Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

HARMIT SINGH versus AMIR SINGH

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Harmit Singh v. Amir Singh - CR-5778-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9310 (27 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.R.No. 5778 of 2006

Date of decision : 3.11.2006.

Harmit Singh

.........Petitioner.

Versus

Amir Singh

...........Respondent.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA
Present : Mr. Kuldip Sanwal,Advocate

for the petitioner.

****

VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL )

The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 27.9.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.),Patiala rejecting the application moved under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for amendment of the plaint.

The only ground the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as mere suit for possession is not maintainable without seeking declaration, therefore, it was necessary to amend the plaint. This contention is misconceived as mere suit for possession is competent.

No ground for interference.

Dismissed.

November 3,2006 ( VINOD K. SHARMA )

'sp' JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.