High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Harmit Singh v. Amir Singh - CR-5778-2006  RD-P&H 9310 (27 October 2006)
C.R.No. 5778 of 2006
Date of decision : 3.11.2006.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA
Present : Mr. Kuldip Sanwal,Advocate
for the petitioner.
VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL )
The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 27.9.2006 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Divn.),Patiala rejecting the application moved under Order 6 Rule 17 read with Section 151 C.P.C. for amendment of the plaint.
The only ground the learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as mere suit for possession is not maintainable without seeking declaration, therefore, it was necessary to amend the plaint. This contention is misconceived as mere suit for possession is competent.
No ground for interference.
November 3,2006 ( VINOD K. SHARMA )
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.