Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NARENDER PAL @ BANTY @ BUNTY versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Narender Pal @ Banty @ Bunty v. State of Haryana - CRM-61182-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9348 (27 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.61182-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:30.10.2006

Narender Pal @ Banty @ Bunty ..........Petitioner Versus

State of Haryana ..........Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- Shri Gorakh Nath, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Shri Partap Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

Petitioner Narender Pal @ Banty @ Bunty apprehending his arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No. 457 dated 24.9.2006 under Sections 452,323 and 506 read with Section 34 IPC, registered at Police Station Safidon, District Jind, has filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail.

I have heard counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioner contends that all the allegations levelled against the petitioner in the aforesaid FIR are totally false and the only non-bailable offence is under Section 452 and 506 IPC.

Counsel for the petitioner further contends that in view of the order dated 3.10.2006, the petitioner has joined the investigation. This fact has not been disputed by the State Counsel.

In view of the above, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, the interim bail, granted vide order dated 3.10.2006 is made absolute.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter the petitioner shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

October 30, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.