Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

DAYA NAND versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Daya Nand v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-14915-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9411 (27 October 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

CWP No. 14915 of 2006

Date of Decision: October 23, 2006

Daya Nand

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. S.K. Verma Jind, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

The grievance made by the petitioner in the instant petition is to quash order dated 27.9.2005 (P-7) imposing upon him the punishment of stoppage of two annual grade increments with cumulative effect as well as forfeiting salary in respect of his suspension period from 18.4.1994 to 20.1.2005 by treating the same as a period spent on the leave of the kind due, vide order dated 10.2.2006 (P-10). The order dated 10.2.2006 has been passed by the punishing authority after issuing show cause notice under Rule 7.3 of the Civil Services Rules Volume-I Part-I. It has been asserted that against both the orders the petitioner has preferred appeals under Rule 9 of the Haryana Civil Service (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1987 on 16.11.2005 (P-8) and 12.4.2006 (P-11), which are pending CWP No. 14915 of 2006

consideration of the Financial Commissioner and Principal Secretary to Government of Haryana, Irrigation Department.

In view of the above, at this stage without going into the merits of the case we direct the Financial Commissioner to dispose of the appeals, if any such appeal is filed by the petitioner, within a period of four months from the date a certified copy of the order is produced before him. It shall be appreciated that a detailed speaking order after granting opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner is passed by keeping in view the provisions of Civil Service Rules and instructions applicable to the case of the petitioner.

The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

October 23, 2006 JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.