Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJ KUMARI versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Raj Kumari v. State of Haryana & Ors - CWP-17283-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9482 (30 October 2006)

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

C.W.P. No. 17283 of 2006

Date of Decision: 2.11.2006

Raj Kumari

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI

PRESENT: Mr. H.P.S. Bhinder, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

JUDGMENT

M.M. KUMAR, J. (Oral)

This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing order dated 12.6.2006 (P-4) whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Government High School, Jalalana, District Sirsa to Government Sr. Secondary School, Jodhkan, District Sirsa. Challenge to the transfer order of respondent No. 4, dated 2.7.2006(P-5) has also been made. A further prayer has been made directing the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for his posting at Government High School, Jalalana and to cancel the transfer order of respondent No. 4 or in the alternative to post the petitioner at Government Senior C.W.P. No. 17282 of 2006

Secondary School, Pipli or Government High School, Mangiana or Government High School, Panniwala Ruldu, District Sirsa.

For the relief claimed in the instant petition, the petitioner has already sent a representation, dated 25.9.2006 (P-6) to the respondents.

Without going into the merits of the case, we deem it just and appropriate to direct the respondents to take cognizance of the representation dated 25.9.2006 (P-6) sent by the petitioner and decide the same expeditiously preferably within a period of two months from the date a certified copy of this order is presented to them. The petitioner shall be at liberty to file a supplementary representation within one week from today under Registered A.D. cover. It shall be appreciated if a speaking order is passed.

Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

(M.M. KUMAR)

JUDGE

(M.M.S. BEDI)

November 2, 2006

JUDGE

Pkapoor


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.