Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VINOD JINDAL versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Vinod Jindal v. State of Haryana & Ors. - CRM-16450-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9665 (1 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl. Misc. No.16450-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION:6.11.2006

Vinod Jindal ..........Petitioner

Versus

State of Haryana & Ors. ..........Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present:- Shri Arun Jindal, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Shri Partap Singh, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

****

The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

for registration of a criminal case against respondents No.4 to 14.

Counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the reply filed by the respondent-State, particularly, to the effect that the parties have entered into a compromise, he does not want to press this petition.

Dismissed as not pressed.

November 6, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

pooja JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.