Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

N.A. versus N.A.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


n.a. v. n.a. - CRM-57244-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9670 (1 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CRL.M.No.57244-M of 2006

DATE OF ORDER:13.11.2006

CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*.

Present: Mr. Anil Khetarpal, Advocate.

M.M. AGGARWAL,J

This is petition for grant of anticipatory bail. Case is for the offence under Sections 307/323/336/148/149 IPC and 120-B IPC.

On behalf of the petitioner, it is argued that Darshan injured had suffered only three injuries, which are simple in nature whereas the petitioner had suffered as many as 14 injuries and that he has joined investigation under the orders of the Additional Sessions Judge, Moga.

In view of the details facts noted in order dated 21.9.2006, order granting anticipatory bail is made absolute. However, petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called upon to do so and shall be bound by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

November 13, 2006 ( M.M. AGGARWAL )

manoj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.