Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SURESH CHAND & ANR versus DAKSHINI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Suresh Chand & Anr v. Dakshini Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. - CWP-6966-2004 [2006] RD-P&H 9703 (1 November 2006)

C.W.P. No. 6966 of 2004 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 6966 of 2004

Date of Decision: October 26, 2006

Suresh Chand and another

.....Petitioners

Vs.

Dakshini Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. and others .....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. Gaurav Kathuria, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Suveer Sheokand, Advocate for the respondents.

-.-

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners requests for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to avail any other remedy including the remedy of seeking reference under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty in terms of the prayer made.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

C.W.P. No. 6966 of 2004 [2]

October 26, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.