Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAJAL & ANR versus STATE OF HARYANA & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kajal & Anr v. State of Haryana & Ors - CRM-66938-m-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9711 (2 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No. 66938-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 6, 2006

Kajal and another

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana and others

...RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. R.S.Mamli, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

...

The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuing direction to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at the hands of respondents No.5 and 6.

Counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the changed circumstances, the petitioners do not want to press this petition with liberty to approach again in case there is a fresh threat to their life and liberty.

Dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty.

November 6, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.