High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh
Case Law Search
Subhash Chander Malik v. U.T. Chandigarh & Ors - CWP-15085-2006  RD-P&H 9728 (2 November 2006)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
C.W.P. No. 15085 of 2006
Date of Decision: November 6, 2006
Subhash Chander Malik
U.T. Chandigarh and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.
Present:- Mr. Kamla Malik, Advocate with Mr. S.C. Malik, petitioner in person.
Mr. Anupam Gupta, Advocate with
Mr. Vishal Sodhi, Advocate
for respondents No.1 and 2.
Mr. R.K.Dhiman, Advocate
for respondent No.3.
M.M. KUMAR. J. (ORAL)
Mr. Anupam Gupta, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, on instructions from Ravinder Sharma, Superintendent, House Allotment C.W.P. No. 15085 of 2006 
Committee, right at the outset has made a statement that ground floor of House No.1018, Sector 41-B, Chandigarh, earlier occupied by Mr. R.S.
Kundu is available since Mr. Kundu has expired and the same is offered to the petitioner. Mr. S.C.Malik, the petitioner accept this offer and states that the same be allotted to him by cancelling his earlier allotment in respect of House No. 1006, Sector 41-B, Chandigarh, allotted to him on September 14,
2006. There is no objection on the part of respondent No.3 to the aforementioned course being adopted.
In view of the above, we direct that respondents No.1 and 2 may allot the ground floor of house No. 1018, Sector 41-B, Chandigarh, to the petitioner, as agreed between the parties. The house allotted to the petitioner, namely, House No. 1006, Sector 41-B, Chandigarh, on September 14, 2006 shall stand cancelled on the allotment of House No.
1018, Sector 41-B, Chandigarh. The needful shall be done within a period of two weeks.
In view of the above, the petition is accordingly disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
November 6, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.