Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

M.S. WALIA versus UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND OTH

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


M.S. Walia v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and oth - CWP-15164-2005 [2006] RD-P&H 9729 (2 November 2006)

C.W.P. No. 15164 of 2005 [1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

C.W.P. No. 15164 of 2005

Date of Decision: November 6, 2006

M.S. Walia

.....Petitioner

Vs.

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam and others .....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. KUMAR.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

Present:- Mr. Subhash Ahuja, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate

for the respondents.

-.-

M.M. KUMAR. J. (ORAL)

In pursuance to our order dated October 16,2006, another amount of Rs.5,34,100/- has been paid to the petitioner by way of crossed cheque bearing No. 838399 dated November 3, 2006, drawn on State Bank of Patiala, Sector 7, Panchkula. It is appropriate to mention that on the last date of hearing, an amount of Rs.5,18,000/- was paid to the petitioner.

C.W.P. No. 15164 of 2005 [2]

However, learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to furnish all the details for which the amount has been paid.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the request made by the counsel for the petitioner, we dispose of the writ petition by leaving it open to the petitioner to make a representation with regard to the remaining amount. The representation may also specify the demand in respect of the details of the amount paid to the petitioner including Rs.5,18,000/- and Rs.5,34,100/-. The petitioner may also claim interest on the delayed payment of his retrial benefits by placing reliance on Government instructions dated February 20, 2002 (P-9). Let a representation to that effect be made within a period of one month from today under registered A.D. cover and the same shall be decided by the respondents within a further period of two months, by passing a speaking order and made all the details of the payments made and as to whether the petitioner is entitled to interest or not.

(M.M.KUMAR)

JUDGE

November 6, 2006 (M.M.S.BEDI)

sanjay JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.