SHEELA RANI & ANR versus THE STATE OF PUNJAB

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Sheela Rani & Anr v. The State of Punjab - CRM-38092-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9790 (3 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.38092-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: NOVEMBER 10, 2006

Sheela Rani and another

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

The State of Punjab

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Liaqat Ali, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Punjab.

...

The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.140 dated 5.6.2006 registered under Sections 498- A/406/506 IPC at Police Station City Maolut, District Muktsar, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.

I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

The petitioners are mother-in-law and father-in-law of Sarika alias Sonia. In this case, the daughter of the petitioners was married with the son of the complainant and the daughter of the complainant was married with the son of the petitioners. At the time of issuing notice of motion, counsel for the petitioners agreed to pay an amount of Rs.50,000/- by way of draft in favour of Sarika alias Sonia within ten days. The said amount of Rs.50,000/-by way of bank draft has been handed over to the counsel for the complainant in Court today.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that in terms of the interim order dated July 6, 2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute this fact.

In view of the above and for the reasons stated in the interim order dated July 6, 2006, the same is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

This bail order shall remain in operation till the investigation culminates into filing of challan under Section 173 Cr.P.C. except for material change in the circumstances. Thereafter, the petitioners shall be entitled to the grant of regular bail by the trial Court and the same shall further continue till conclusion of the trial on the conditions to be imposed by the court of competent jurisdiction.

Disposed of accordingly.

November 10, 2006 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.