RAVI PAUL versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

Ravi Paul v. State of Punjab & Ors - CWP-17398-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9833 (3 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CWP NO.17398 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: November 3, 2006

Ravi Paul

....Petitioner

VERSUS

State of Punjab and others

.....Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. BHALLA

PRESENT: Shri Sandeep Arora, Advocate for the petitioner.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

From the perusal of averments made in the present petition, we find that the petitioner has absolutely no locus standi to file the present petition.

Even otherwise, we find that the petitioner is required to approach the respondent authorities at the first instance seeking relief, which has been sought by him, before this Court.

For the aforesaid purpose, the petitioner shall be required to file a detailed and comprehensive individual representations before all the official respondents.

Disposed of with the aforesaid observations.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

(Viney Mittal)

Judge

November 3, 2006 (H.S. Bhalla)

KD Judge

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.