Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAJIV KUMAR SHARMA versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Rajiv Kumar Sharma v. State of Haryana & Anr - CRM-20481-M-2006 [2006] RD-P&H 9943 (6 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 20481-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 13.11.2006

Rajiv Kumar Sharma

.... PETITIONER

Versus

State of Haryana and another

..... RESPONDENTS

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. A.S. Sullar, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. S.S. Mor, Senior DAG, Haryana.

* * *

Counsel for the petitioner states that since the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial court, therefore, this petition for quashing of FIR No. 123 dated 23.5.2005 under Sections 376, 467, 468, 471 read with Section 120-B IPC, registered at Police Station Parao, District Ambala, has become infructuous.

Ordered accordingly.

November 13, 2006 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.