Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TEJA SINGH & ORS versus SARWAN SINGH & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Teja Singh & Ors v. Sarwan Singh & Ors - RSA-1942-2001 [2007] RD-P&H 1236 (5 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH

R.S.A. No. 1942 of 2001

Date of decision January 12, 2007

Teja Singh and others

.......Appellants

Versus

Sarwan Singh and others

........Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
Present:- Sh. Vikram Mann , Advocate

for the appellants.

Sh. J. R. Mittal , Senior Advocate with

Sh. Kashmir Singh, Advocate

for the respondents.

****

Viney Mittal, J (Oral)

Respondent No.3 Jagdev Singh had died. Time was granted by this Court on various occasions to bring on record his legal representatives. On November 28, 2005, this Court had granted last opportunity to the learned counsel for the appellants to do the needful. It was made clear that no further opportunity shall be granted.

No steps had been taken by the learned counsel for the appellants in this regard.

On April 18, 2006, the following order was passed:- "On November 28,2005, one last opportunity was granted to the appellants for bringing on record the legal representatives of respondent No.3. It was also made clear that no further opportunity shall be granted.

Learned counsel for the appellants, however, comes up with a request to grant one more opportunity as according to him, despite repeated efforts, the appellants have not contacted him.

In the interest of justice, one more last opportunity is granted to do the needful. It is also made clear that if the requisite steps are not taken, the appeal shall be dismissed for non-prosecution.

Adjourned to 8.5.2006."

Needful has not been done so far. Learned counsel for the appellants informs the Court that despite many efforts made by him, the appellants have not contacted him.

In view of the aforesaid fact, the present appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

(VINEY MITTAL)

JUDGE

January 12, 2007

archana


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.