Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RAM SARAN versus SURESH KUMAR ETC.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Ram Saran v. Suresh Kumar etc. - RSA-2181-2001 [2007] RD-P&H 1237 (5 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

RSA NO. 2181 of 2001(O&M)

Date of decision. February 6,2007

Ram Saran . .....Appellant

Versus

Suresh Kumar etc. ......Respondents

CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
PRESENT Mr. Ajay Kaushik,Advocate

appellant.

Mr. Kulvir Narwal, Advocate

for respondent.

VINEY MITTAL , J( Oral )

Defendant no.1 is appellant before this Court. He has lost concurrently before the two Courts below.

A suit for possession by way of partition was filed by Suresh Kumar. The said suit filed by the plaintiff has been decreed by the trial Court and appeal filed by the defendant no.1 has been dismissed by the first Appellate Court. Vide order dated July 5, 2001, this Court had noticed the statement of the learned counsel for the appellant when he had not pressed the present appeal on merits. However, notice of motion was issued only on a statement made by the learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant had already raised construction on 1/14th share of the

plaintiff and his client is ready to pay the market price of the same.

Sh. Kulvir Narwal, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff / respondent states that the aforesaid offer made by the defendant / appellant is not acceptable to the plaintiff in as much as plaintiff had already a large family and wants his entire portion for occupation of his own family.

Keeping in view the aforesaid factual position and also the fact that the appellant had not pressed the present appeal on merits, the present appeal is dismissed.

Even otherwise, I do not find that any substantial question of law arises for consideration in the present appeal.

Dismissed.

February 6, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL )

mamta JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.