Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

BALBIR & ANR versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Balbir & Anr v. State of Haryana - CRM-76262-M-2006 [2007] RD-P&H 1278 (6 February 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Crl.Misc.No.76262-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: FEBRUARY 5, 2007

Balbir and another

...PETITIONERS

VERSUS

State of Haryana

...RESPONDENT

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr.Lalit Gupta, Advocate,

for Mr.S.S.Gill, Advocate,

for the petitioners.

Mr.Partap Singh, Sr.DAG, Haryana.

...

The petitioners apprehending their arrest in a non-bailable offence in case FIR No.246 dated 11.11.2006 registered under Sections 148,149,323,324,452,506 and later on added under Sections 325,326 and 307 IPC at Police Station Sadar Panipat, have filed this petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for grant of anticipatory bail.

While issuing notice of motion on December 7, 2006, arrest of the petitioners was stayed subject to their joining the investigation.

I have heard the counsel for the parties and gone through the contents of the FIR.

Counsel for the petitioners contends that petitioner No.1 has been attributed only simple injuries whereas petitioner No.2 is alleged to have caused grievous injury by sharp edged weapon to one Bijender.

Counsel contends that initially when the case was registered under Sections 148,149,323,324,452,506 IPC, the petitioners were arrested and were granted regular bail after six days.

Counsel further contends in terms of the interim order dated December 7, 2006, the petitioners have joined the investigation. In this case, challan has also been presented. Counsel for the respondent-State does not dispute these facts and further states that the petitioners are no more required for further investigation.

In view of the above, the interim order dated December 7, 2006, is made absolute on the same terms and conditions.

Disposed of accordingly.

February 5, 2007 (SATISH KUMAR MITTAL)

vkg JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.