Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KARAN AMOL SINGH versus SHAKOOR DEEN & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Karan Amol Singh v. Shakoor Deen & Ors. - CR-2705-2005 [2007] RD-P&H 150 (9 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.R.No. 2705 of 2005

Date of decision : 12.1.2007

Karan Amol Singh

.........Petitioner.

Versus

Shakoor Deen & Ors.

...........Respondents.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD K. SHARMA
Present : Mr. Harmandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate

for the respondents No. 4 to 8, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29,34, 35, 36, 41,43, 44, 45,50-54, 56, 57,59, 60, 61, 63, 64,65, 66, 67,69, 71,72, 73, 74, 75, 77,78, 79, 80, 81, 86, 87, 91, 92,96, 97, 99,100, 101, 103 to 107, 109, 110, 111, 112,120, 121,123,128, 137, 138.

****

VINOD K. SHARMA,J.( ORAL )

The present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 26.2.2005 passed by the learned `Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Jagadhri vide which an option was given to the petitioner herein to choose one sale deed out of the five sale deeds, challenged in a suit, in order to pursue his suit further.

The petitioner had filed a suit challenging various sale deeds in one suit. The sale deeds were also executed in favour of different defendants. The respondents herein moved an application for dismissal of the suit on plea of misjoinder of causes of action. The said application has been accepted by placing reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble High Court reported as Sant Singh and Others Vs. Desh Ram and others AIR 1974 (P&H) 276.

C.R.No. 2705 of 2005 [2]

The learned counsel for the respondents has placed reliance on the decision of this Court in C.R. No. 3286 of 2004 titled Karan Amol Singh Versus Basta Singh & Ors. decided on 8.8.2006. Though in the said case an option was given to the petitioner to select one of the sale deeds, however that relief is not required to be given to the petitioner herein as the learned trial Court has already given an option to the petitioner to choose one out of the five sale deeds, challenged in a suit, in order to pursue his suit further.

There is no error or illegality in the impugned order which may call for interference by this Court.

Dismissed.

12.1.2007. ( VINOD K. SHARMA )

'sp' JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.