Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SEEMA RANI versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Seema Rani v. State of Punjab & Ors. - CWP-914-2007 [2007] RD-P&H 363 (15 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 914 of 2007

Date of Decision : 19.01.2007

Seema Rani ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others. .. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR,
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND.

Present : Mr. Sameer Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral)

Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner inter alia claims the monetary benefits due to her father, who has been missing since 25.05.1985. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been making requests to officers of the respondents but has not been favoured with any sympathetic consideration, eventually leading her to serve a legal notice dated 15.06.2006 (Annexure P-8). It is the vehement contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will be satisfied, if the instant writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. the Director, Department of Ayurveda, Punjab, requiring him to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 15.6.2006 (Annexure P-8).

Notice of motion.

On our asking, Mr. B.S. Chahal, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents states that he has no objection to the disposal of the instant writ CWP No.914 of 2007 2

petition in terms of the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the same by directing respondent No.2 i.e. the Director, Department of Ayurveda, Punjab, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 15.6.2006 (Annexure P-8) by passing a well reasoned speaking order, within two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to the petitioner within one month thereafter.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

January 19, 2007 ( S.D. Anand )

vkd Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.