Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. KAMLA BANSAL versus STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Smt. Kamla Bansal v. State of Punjab & Ors. - CWP-20110-2006 [2007] RD-P&H 431 (15 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.W.P. No. 20110 of 2006

Date of Decision : 18.12.2006

Smt. Kamla Bansal ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Punjab and others. .. Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.S. KHEHAR,
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. ANAND.

Present : Mr. V.K. Shukla, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

J.S. Khehar, J. (Oral)

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that although some of the retiral benefits have been paid to the petitioner, but General Provident Fund and the Group Insurance Scheme are still unpaid. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner, that the petitioner issued a legal notice dated 11.08.2005 (Annexure P-1) claiming his remaining retiral benefits, but no decision has been taken thereon till date.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner will be satisfied, if the instant writ petition is disposed of, with a direction to respondent No.2, i.e., the Director, Public Instructions (Secondary Education), Punjab, requiring him to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 11.8.2005 (Annexure P/1).

In view of the above, without going into the merits of the claim raised by the petitioner, we consider it just and appropriate to dispose of the instant writ petition, with a direction to respondent No.2 i.e. the Director, CWP No. 20110 of 2006 2

Public Instructions (Secondary Education), Punjab, to take a final decision on the legal notice dated 11.8.2005 (Annexure P/1) by passing a well reasoned speaking order, within two months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of the order. In case the petitioner is found entitled to any monetary benefits, the same shall be calculated and released to the petitioner within a further period of one month.

Disposed of accordingly.

Order dasti on payment of usual charges.

( J.S. Khehar )

Judge

December 18, 2006 ( S.D. Anand )

vkd Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.