Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KANTULA versus NOOR MOHD. & ANOTHER

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kantula v. Noor Mohd. & another - CR-6234-2006 [2007] RD-P&H 657 (19 January 2007)

CR NO. 6234 of 2006 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR NO. 6234 of 2006

DATE OF DECISION. January 22, 2007.

Kantula ......Petitioner

Versus

Noor Mohd. & another ......Respondents

CORAM HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
PRESENT Mr. Lokesh Sinhal ,Advocate

for the petitioner.

VINEY MITTAL, J ( Oral )

Plaintiff is the petitioner before this Court.

He is aggrieved against the order dated October 16, 2006 passed by the trial Judge whereby the evidence of the plaintiff has been ordered to be closed.

After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances although, I find that plaintiff has been quite negligent in not producing his evidence on various dates fixed by the trial Court for the aforesaid purpose but keeping in view the interest of justice, I find that one last opportunity needs to be granted to the plaintiff for production of the evidence.

Consequently present petition is allowed.

Order dated October 16, 2006 passed by the trial judge is set aside subject to the payment of Rs. 5,000/- as costs. The cost would be a condition precedent for allowing the plaintiff to lead his evidence.

The trial Court shall fix one date, On the aforesaid date, the plaintiff shall pay cost and shall conclude his entire evidence on his own CR NO. 6234 of 2006 2

responsibility and without the assistance of the Court. If the plaintiff fails to pay the cost or the evidence is not concluded by him, no further opportunity shall be granted to in and in such situation, the present petition shall be deemed to have been dismissed.

A copy of the order be given dasti on usual charges.

January 22, 2007 ( VINEY MITTAL )

mamta JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.