Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KESAR DEVI AND ANOTHER versus BADHO AND ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kesar Devi and Another v. Badho and Ors - CR-521-2007 [2007] RD-P&H 720 (20 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

C.R.No.521 of 2007

DATE OF ORDER: 30.1.2007

Kesar Devi and Another

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

Badho and Others

....Respondent(s)

CORUM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. AGGARWAL .*.*.*.

Present: Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate.

M.M. AGGARWAL,J

This is petition against order dated 21.7.2006 passed by Additional Civil Judge(Sr.Divn.), Fazilka whereby an application of the plaintiff U/o 1 Rule 10 CPC for impleading certain persons as defendants and U/o 6 Rule 17 CPC for amendment of the plaint was allowed.

Counsel for the petitioners argues that the suit was filed in 2003 and the plea now being raised by way of amendment was within the knowledge of the plaintiffs at that time also but this application was made at bilated stage.

I find that this petition was filed after about six months of the order. Even otherwise I do not find any good ground to interfere.

Dismissed.

January 30, 2007 ( M.M. AGGARWAL )

manoj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.