Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED versus SONIA JAGGI @ GUJRAL & ORS

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


National Insurance Company Limited v. Sonia Jaggi @ Gujral & Ors - CM-20732-CII-2006 [2007] RD-P&H 759 (22 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CM NO.20732-CII of 2006

DATE OF DECISION: January 9, 2007

National Insurance Company Limited

....Petitioner

VERSUS

Sonia Jaggi @ Gujral and others

....

Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEY MITTAL
PRESENT: Shri Inder Jit Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner.

Shri Anurag Chopra, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Shri Brijender Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Shri Amit Gupta, Advocate for respondents No.4 to 6.

Viney Mittal,J.(Oral).

The present petition has been filed by the Insurance Company. It has been averred in the present petition that claim petitions have been filed by some of the claimants at Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhari, whereas, another claim petition has been filed before the Tribunal at Ambala.

In view of the aforesaid fact, the Insurance Company has prayed that all the claim petitions be ordered to be tried together at one place.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have stated that they have no objection if the claim petition, which is stated to be pending before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ambala is also transferred to the Tribunal at Jagadhari.

In view of the consent given by the learned counsel for the respondents, it is directed that the claim petition, which is stated to be pending before the Tribunal at Ambala, shall stand transferred to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Jagadhari and shall be tried together with the claim petition titled Munish Jaggi vs. Rafool Singh, which is already pending before the Tribunal at Jagadhari.

The present petition is consequently disposed of.

A copy of the order be given dasti on payment of usual charges.

January 9, 2007 (Viney Mittal)

KD Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.