Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

KAYYUM MOHAMMAD versus STATE OF HARYANA

High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


Kayyum Mohammad v. State of Haryana - CRM-73669-M-2006 [2007] RD-P&H 991 (29 January 2007)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Crl. Misc. No. 73669-M of 2006

DATE OF DECISION : 30.01.2007

Kayyum Mohammad

.... PETITIONER

Versus

State of Haryana

..... RESPONDENT

CORAM :- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Present: Mr. Ashit Malik, Advocate, for

Mr. Jagdish Manchanda, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Partap Singh, Senior D.A.G., Haryana.

* * *

Petitioner Kayyum Mohammad has filed this petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for the grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 237 dated 28.7.2006 under Sections 323/324/325/307/34 IPC, registered at Police Station Mujessar Faridabad, District Faridabad.

Counsel for the respondent-State, on instructions from Dharam Chand HC, Police Station Mujessar, informs that the petitioner has been acquitted by the trial court on January 29, 2007. In view of this fact, the instant petition has become infructuous.

Dismissed as infructuous.

January 30, 2007 ( SATISH KUMAR MITTAL ) ndj JUDGE


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.