Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

MUHAMMAD MEERAN, S/O.MUHAMMED versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


MUHAMMAD MEERAN, S/O.MUHAMMED v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 7592 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 1 (1 January 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7592 of 2006()

1. MUHAMMAD MEERAN, S/O.MUHAMMED,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.T.M.ABDUL LATHEEF

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

Dated :01/01/2006

O R D E R

V. RAMKUMAR, J.

Bail Application No. 7592 of 2006

DATED: 9th January, 2007

O R D E R

Petitioner who is the second accused in Crime No. 236/06 of Kasba Police Station, Kozhikode for an offence punishable under Sec.21 of the N.D.P.S. Act for allegedly having been found in possession of 930 gms. of brown sugar, seeks his enlargement on bail. He was arrested on 10-7-2006.

2. Even though the learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application he fairly conceded that the final report has not been filed even after 180 days of judicial custody of the petitioner. If so, by virtue of the proviso to sec.167(2) Cr.P.C. read with Sec. 36 A of the N.D.P.S. Act, the petitioner is entitled to be released on bail as of right.

3. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Court for Trial of N.D.P.S. Cases, Vadakara and subject to the following conditions:- Bail A.No.7592 of 2006 -:2:-

1. Petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays.

2. Petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the prosecution witnesses nor shall he attempt to tamper with the evidence for the prosecution.

3. The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer.

4. Petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail. If the petitioner commits breach of any of the above conditions, the bail granted to him shall be liable to be cancelled. This bail application is allowed as above.

V.RAMKUMAR, JUDGE

ani/- Bail A.No.7592 of 2006 -:3:-


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.