Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. MANI versus STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. MANI v. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY - Bail Appl No. 5811 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 1061 (11 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5811 of 2006()

1. SUNIL KUMAR, S/O. MANI,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
... Respondent

For Petitioner :SRI.P.VIJAYA BHANU

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :11/10/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A. 5811/2006

DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner is accused of the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC, in crime No.368/2006 of Alathur Police Station, and therefore, he was arrested on 10.7.2006. He remains in judicial custody. Hence this application, under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2. I heard the arguments of both sides. Considering the duration of the judicial detention and the near completion of the investigation, I grant bail and release the petitioner from jail, subject to the following conditions:-

(a). The petitioner shall execute a bond for Rs.25,000/-, with two solvent sureties, each for the like sum, to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Alathur. B.A.5811/2006 2

(b). The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer, once in a week on every Tuesday, between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m., for a period of four months, starting from 17.10.2006, and thereafter, on the first working day of every month, between the same timings, till the completion of the trial and final disposal of the sessions case.

(c). The petitioner shall not leave the State of Kerala, till the final disposal of the Sessions case.

(d). The petitioner shall not interfere with the investigation, attempt to influence or threaten the witnesses or cause any hindrance to the smooth conduct of the prosecution case, during the trial. The application is allowed as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.