Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

ALI, S/O.MAMMU versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


ALI, S/O.MAMMU v. STATE OF KERALA - Bail Appl No. 6099 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 1069 (12 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 6099 of 2006()

1. ALI, S/O.MAMMU,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. SEENTHA, D/O.UMMER,

For Petitioner :SRI.H.BADARUDDIN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.M.JAMES

Dated :12/10/2006

O R D E R

J.M.JAMES, J.

B.A. 6099/2006

DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2006

O R D E R

The petitioner is before this Court, under Section 438 Cr.P.C., as he apprehends arrest in crime No.599/2006 of Taliparamba Police Station, for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC.

2. The allegation against the petitioner is that after giving false promise of marriage, he trespassed into the hospital and committed rape on the defacto complainant, on one occasion. Thereafter, she was threatened. Out of fear, she did not disclose to anyone. On repeated by giving promise that he would marry her, he continued his act. Believing that he would surely marry her as promised, and also because of the fact that two sisters of marriageable age are in the house of the defacto complainant, she kept quite believing the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner, while she was proceeding to her maternal aunt's house, had committed rape on her in the arecanut garden, on 15.5.2006 at 7.00 p.m. Because B.A.6099/2006 2 of the subsequent conduct of the petitioner, she made a complaint before the Court below, which was forwarded to the police and crime had been registered, as stated above.

3. After hearing both sides and considering the materials that are placed before me, I direct the petitioner to surrender before the Investigating Officer, who is investigating crime No.599/2006 of Taliparamba Police Station, on 19.10.2006 between 9.30 a.m and 10.00 a.m.

4. The Investigating Officer shall interrogate the petitioner and thereafter, produce him before the Court below, as per the law.

5. On production of the petitioner, accused, the learned Magistrate shall hear both sides and pass appropriate orders, on merit. The application is disposed of as above. J.M.JAMES

JUDGE

mrcs


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.