Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

V.L. JAMES versus BRANCH MANAGER

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


V.L. JAMES v. BRANCH MANAGER - WP(C) No. 14684 of 2006(W) [2006] RD-KL 1235 (17 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 14684 of 2006(W)

1. V.L.JAMES, S/O.LOUIS, AGED 52 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. BRANCH MANAGER,
... Respondent

2. SALE OFFICER, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT

3. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

For Petitioner :SRI.R.DIVAKARAN

For Respondent :SRI.M.PAUL VARGHESE

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

Dated :17/10/2006

O R D E R

K. Thankappan, J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C). No. 14684 of 2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 17th day of October, 2006



JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court for a direction directing respondents 1 and 3 to consider Exts.P2 and P3 and pass orders thereon on the basis of Ext.P1 circular. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per Ext.P1 circular, the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of one time settlement scheme. While admitting the writ petition, this Court granted interim stay of P4 demand notice on condition that the petitioner deposits at the rate of Rs.18,000/- per month payable on the last working day of every month, commencing from June, 2006. The competent authority was directed to take a decision on Exts.P2 and P3 and place the same before this Court. It is submitted that Exts.P2 and P3 are not considered till this time.

2. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of by directing the 1st respondent to consider Exts.P2 and P3 and take a decision thereon as early as possible, at any rate within 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this judgment. The interim order dated 6-6-2006 is made absolute and the petitioner is directed to continue the payment as ordered. 2 K.Thankappan, Judge. mn.

K. Thankappan,J.


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
W.P.(C) No. /2006
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment 17-10-2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.