Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

SMT. P.J. SURYA KUMARI versus GOVERNMENT OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


SMT. P.J. SURYA KUMARI v. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA - OP No. 6743 of 2003(C) [2006] RD-KL 1405 (25 October 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

OP No. 6743 of 2003(C)

1. SMT.P.J.SURYA KUMARI, AGED 51 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS
... Respondent

2. THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (AUDIT) KERALA,

3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.S.HARIKRISHNAN

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :25/10/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

O.P.No.6743 of 2003 Dated 25th October, 2006.

J U D G M E N T

The writ petition is filed mainly with the following prayers :- (1)Issue a writ of certiorari, or other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing Ext.P4. (2)Declare that the petitioner's pay is not liable to be reviewed or regulated and that she is not liable to refund any amount towards any alleged excess pay drawn on the basis of the re-option dt. 24.4.1999 exercised by her in terms of Ext.P3 G.O. dt. 5.2.1999 and direct the respondents accordingly. (3)Declare that the re-option already exercised by petitioner is in order and direct the respondents to grant all the consequential benefits arising out of such re-option dt. 24.4.1999 to the petitioner, forthwith. There will be a direction to the first respondent to look into Ext.P5 since action on the audit objection is to be considered by the Government. Ext.P5 shall be disposed of within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment. The interim order passed by this Court in C.M.P.No.11793/03 will continue till such time. It will be open to the petitioner to take all available contentions before the first respondent. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

tgs

KURIAN JOSEPH, J

O.P.No. 6743 of 2003 C

J U D G M E N T

Dated 25th October, 2006.


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.