Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

TELSON THOMAS versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


TELSON THOMAS v. STATE OF KERALA - WP(C) No. 28837 of 2006(G) [2006] RD-KL 1516 (3 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 28837 of 2006(G)

1. TELSON THOMAS, S/O.THOMAS K.T.
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION,

For Petitioner :SRI.BENOY THOMAS

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

Dated :03/11/2006

O R D E R

A.K.BASHEER, J.

W.P.(C) No. 28837 OF 2006

Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2006



JUDGMENT

Petitioner who is working as a Lower Division Clerk in an aided Higher Secondary School has a grievance that his appointment is not being approved by the 2nd respondent. Any how, I do not propose to deal with the merit of the contentions raised by the petitioner in view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel at the Bar. It is submitted that the petitioner has preferred Ext. P4 representation highlighting the relevant aspects of the issue. It is also submitted that petitioner will be satisfied if an appropriate direction is issued to respondent No.1 to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 representation without any further delay.

2. In the above facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1 to consider and pass orders on Ext. P4 strictly on its merit and in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within four WPC28837/2006 2 months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Needless to mention that petitioner, the manager of the School and other candidate who are likely to be affected by the order that may be passed by respondent No.1 shall be afforded sufficient opportunity to be heard before a decision is taken in the matter.

3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a certified copy of this judgment before respondent No. 1 for compliance. The writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. A.K. BASHEER,

JUDGE

csl


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.