Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

L.B. BEEFATHUMMA, KOTTAPPURAM versus THE NILESHWAR SERVICE CO

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


L.B. BEEFATHUMMA, KOTTAPPURAM v. THE NILESHWAR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK - WP(C) No. 35526 of 2005(D) [2006] RD-KL 159 (10 July 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 35526 of 2005(D)

1. L.B.BEEFATHUMMA, KOTTAPPURAM,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE NILESHWAR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK
... Respondent

2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE

For Petitioner :SRI.P.SREEKUMAR

For Respondent :SRI.T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.THANKAPPAN

Dated :10/07/2006

O R D E R

K.THANKAPPAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO. 35526 OF 2005

Dated this the 10th day of July, 2006



JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks to quash Ext.P1 proclamation of sale issued by the Sub Court, Hosdurg.

2. The petitioner availed of a loan from the first respondent - Bank. She filed Ext.P2 application for getting the benefit of One Time Settlement Scheme. When the Writ Petition came up for admission, this Court directed the petitioner to pay an amount of Rs.25,000/- per month commencing from January, 2006. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had already remitted Rs.47,000/-. In the above circumstances, it is only proper for the first respondent to consider the request of the petitioner for one time settlement. The first respondent is, therefore, directed to consider Ext.P2 application filed by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, if the petitioner is found eligible W.P.(C)NO.35526/2005 2 for the benefit. This shall be done within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Further steps, if any, against the petitioner shall be taken only after final decision is taken on Ext.P2 application. The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.

(K.THANKAPPAN, JUDGE)

sp/ W.P.(C)NO.35526/2005 3

K.THANKAPPAN, J.

W.P.(C)NO.35526/2005

JUDGMENT

10TH JULY, 2006 W.P.(C)NO.35526/2005 4


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.