Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

RADHAMANI. A., K.S.R.A.63 versus SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM CORPORATION

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


RADHAMANI. A., K.S.R.A.63 v. SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM CORPORATION - WP(C) No. 22675 of 2006(Y) [2006] RD-KL 1809 (23 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 22675 of 2006(Y)

1. RADHAMANI. A., K.S.R.A.63,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. SECRETARY, TRIVANDRUM CORPORATION
... Respondent

2. TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, TRIVANRUM

3. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE

For Petitioner :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

Dated :23/11/2006

O R D E R

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, J.

W.P.(C) No. 22675 OF 2006

Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2006



JUDGMENT

The Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions, Thiruvananthapuram is impleaded as additional 4th respondent in the Writ Petition. The registry will carry out necessary corrections.

2. Heard Sri. N.Nagaraj Narayanan, counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Nandakumara Menon, Standing Counsel for the Corporation and also Sri.Mathew G. Vadakkel, learned Government Pleader. Sri. Nandakumara Menon, Standing Counsel has filed a statement on behalf of the 1st respondent Corporation. Even though the Writ Petition has been amended incorporating grounds of challenge against Rule 8(3) of the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institution Rules, which provides that the Tribunal is empowered to condone the delay of only one month, I am of the view that it is not necessary that those grounds be considered in this case. I permit the petitioner to prefer an appeal against Ext.P2 before the Tribunal. If the Tribunal for Local Self Government Institutions receives an appeal against Ext.P2 from the writ petitioner within two weeks of petitioner receiving a copy of this judgment, the Tribunal will entertain that appeal as one filed on time notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 8(3). If any appeal is filed by the petitioner as directed above, the same will be disposed of by the Tribunal- additional 4th respondent in accordance with law at its earliest and at any rate within 4 months of the Thiruvananthapuram Corporation being served with WPC No.22675 of 2006 2 notice. In view of the above directions, the interim order staying demolition will continue for a period of two months from today.

PIUS C. KURIAKOSE, JUDGE

btt WPC No.22675 of 2006 3


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.