Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

A.I. JAMES versus STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


A.I. JAMES v. STATE OF KERALA - Crl MC No. 3878 of 2006 [2006] RD-KL 1955 (28 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl MC No. 3878 of 2006()

1. A.I.JAMES,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

For Petitioner :SRI.T.M.CHANDRAN

For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

Dated :28/11/2006

O R D E R

R. BASANT, J.

CRL.M.C.NO. 3878 OF 2006

Dated this the 28th day of November, 2006

ORDER

The petitioner, who has been granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions by another Bench of this Court as per the order dated 17/11/2006, prays that the conditions imposed on the petitioner can now be deleted. He is aggrieved by the condition that he must appear before the Investigating Officer between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Wednesdays. The petitioner has been granted time for one month to appear before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail.

2. The petitioner has not appeared before the learned Magistrate so far. In the meantime, the learned Public Prosecutor submits that the investigation is complete and the final report has already been filed.

3. It is for the petitioner to appear before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail in accordance with the directions in the order granting anticipatory bail. I do not find any justification in the prayer for modification of the condition CRL.M.C.NO. 3878 OF 2006 -: 2 :- now. The petitioner must certainly appear before the learned Magistrate at an early date and seek regular bail.

4. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the condition imposed on the petitioner that he must appear before the Investigating Officer on all Wednesday may be kept in abeyance in so far as this Wednesday i.e., 29/11/2006 is concerned as his personal presence is unavoidably required at Bangalore in connection with his work. The learned Public Prosecutor does not raise any serious objection against that prayer.

5. I am, in these circumstances, satisfied that the said condition that the petitioner must appear before the Investigating Officer on 29/11/2006 can be dispensed with. The petitioner can certainly surrender before the learned Magistrate on the next Wednesday and seek regular bail. He can certainly request the learned Magistrate not to impose such a condition when regular bail is granted to him.

6. This Crl.M.C. is allowed in part to the extent indicated above. Sd/-

(R. BASANT, JUDGE)

Nan/ //true copy// P.S. To Judge


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.