Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

INSPECTOR OF PLANTATIONS, PEERMADE versus P.K. SINGH

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


INSPECTOR OF PLANTATIONS, PEERMADE v. P.K. SINGH - CRL A No. 616 of 1999 [2006] RD-KL 2090 (29 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRL A No. 616 of 1999()

1. INSPECTOR OF PLANTATIONS,PEERMADE
... Petitioner

Vs

1. P.K.SINGH
... Respondent

For Petitioner :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

For Respondent : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice J.B.KOSHY

Dated :29/11/2006

O R D E R

J.B.KOSHY, J.

Criminal Appeal.No.616 OF 1999 ()

Dated this the 29th day of November, 2006



JUDGMENT

A complaint was filed by the appellant under Section 36 of the Plantation Labour Act, 1951, alleging that the employer has violated various provisions of Plantation Labour Act and Rules. It was proved before the court that constructions of drains carrying waste or sullage water and its maintenance were carried out as directed by the Inspector of Plantations. Inspector of Plantations on the visit pointed out certain defects. It is proved by the accused that those defects were cured. A second inspection was not conducted before prosecution steps were enacted. The court also found that the accused was only the Manager of the Estate and it was not proved that he has the ultimate control over the affairs of the Estate so as to prosecute and treat him as the employer as per the Plantation Labour Act. It was not proved that ultimate control was with the Manager. Trial court also found that allegations in the complaint were very vague. In any event, even though notice CRL.APPL.616/1999 2 was issued on 16.9.1999, no further steps were taken to serve notice in the appeal to the accused so far. On going through the findings of the trial court, it can be seen that trial court has considered the entire matter and has taken a possible view and no interference is required in the findings of the trial court. Hence this appeal is dismissed.

J.B.KOSHY, JUDGE

prp J.B.KOSHY Criminal.Appeal.616 OF 1999

JUDGMENT

29th November, 2006


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.