M.V. VIJESH KUMAR versus THE TAHSILDAR, CHENGANNUR

High Court of Kerala

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

---

M.V. VIJESH KUMAR v. THE TAHSILDAR, CHENGANNUR - WP(C) No. 38390 of 2003(T) [2006] RD-KL 2107 (29 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 38390 of 2003(T)

1. M.V.VIJESH KUMAR, S/O.P.K.VIJAYAN, AGED
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE TAHSILDAR, CHENGANNUR.
... Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT OFFICER,

For Petitioner :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED

For Respondent :GOVERNMENT PLEADER

The Hon'ble MR. Justice KURIAN JOSEPH

Dated :29/11/2006

O R D E R

KURIAN JOSEPH, J.

W.P.(C) No.38390 of 2003 Dated 29th November, 2006.

J U D G M E N T

The prayer is for a direction to the first respondent to issue community certificate showing that he belongs to Paravan community. It is seen that pursuant to the interim order, petitioner has obtained the certificate. Hence the writ petition is disposed of making it clear that in case the petitioner has any other grievance, it will be open to him to pursue the same in appropriate proceedings.

KURIAN JOSEPH, JUDGE.

tgs 

KURIAN JOSEPH, J

O.P.No. of 2003

J U D G M E N T

Dated 24th November, 2006. 

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.