Over 2 lakh Indian cases. Search powered by Google!

Case Details

VIJAYAN, AGED 31 YEARS versus THE STATE OF KERALA

High Court of Kerala

Case Law Search

Indian Supreme Court Cases / Judgements / Legislation

Judgement


VIJAYAN, AGED 31 YEARS v. THE STATE OF KERALA - WP(C) No. 23726 of 2006(Y) [2006] RD-KL 2155 (29 November 2006)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 23726 of 2006(Y)

1. VIJAYAN, AGED 31 YEARS,
... Petitioner

Vs

1. THE STATE OF KERALA,
... Respondent

2. THE DISTRICT SUPPLY OFFICER, MALAPPURAM.

3. THE TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER,

4. THE RATIONING INSPECTOR,

For Petitioner :SRI.T.RAJASEKHARAN NAIR

For Respondent :SRI.T.S.RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR

Dated :29/11/2006

O R D E R

C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.

```````````````````````````````````````````````````` W.P. (C) No. 23726 OF 2006 Y ````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Dated this the 29th day of November, 2006



J U D G M E N T

Writ petition is filed by brother of a deceased retail dealer of ration articles claiming right to get the dealership after death of his brother. Government Pleader submitted that the licensee died in 2003 and petitioner came forward with claim only after three years. However, petitioner's case is that application was made in 2004 and it was not considered so far. In any case, since licence is not granted to any other dealer and only application is called for, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioner's case based on Rules. If petitioner is the legal heir entitled to the licence, then the 2nd respondent will verify the bona fides of the claim of the petitioner. If licence is granted the petitioner should be in a position to carry on business in accordance with the terms and conditions of the licence. The 2nd respondent shall conduct enquiry and report the matter to the District Collector and Collector will pass orders. If petitioner is found ineligible, respondents will be free to select any other candidate in terms of notification. The specific case of the additional 5th respondent that the petitioner is only a dummy for another person, who is now running the ration shop will be specifically enquired into and should be considered. The result of the enquiry should be taken into account while deciding the petitioner's claim. The writ petition is disposed of as above.

(C.N. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)

aks


Copyright

Reproduced in accordance with s52(q) of the Copyright Act 1957 (India) from judis.nic.in, indiacode.nic.in and other Indian High Court Websites

Advertisement

dwi Attorney | dui attorney | dwi | dui | austin attorney | san diego attorney | houston attorney | california attorney | washington attorney | minnesota attorney | dallas attorney | alaska attorney | los angeles attorney | dwi | dui | colorado attorney | new york attorney | new jersey attorney | san francisco attorney | seattle attorney | florida attorney | attorney | london lawyer | lawyer michigan | law firm |

Tip:
Double Click on any word for its dictionary meaning or to get reference material on it.